Assignment代寫范文-貧窮的研究

本文是一篇Assignment代寫范文,題目為:Research on poverty,供留學生參考學習寫作格式和內容。這篇Assignment主要討論了關于貧窮的研究。混合方法研究被認為是進行貧困社會學研究的最佳方法。貧困是一個復雜的社會問題,它不僅涉及數據和事實,而且還涉及對物理現象背后的人類意圖的解釋。方法論對貧困研究的影響更為直接,但它不能脫離指導認識論。認識論觀點的采用不是中立的,而是由社會科學家如何看待不同社會因素之間的聯系所決定的。總體而言,混合方法研究被發現是社會科學家研究貧困問題的最佳選擇。

貧窮的研究

assignment代寫范文

以下為Assignment代寫范文全文,格式和內容供留學生參考閱讀學習之用,如有Assignment代寫需要,請聯系網站客服。

Poverty has been a disease of the human society for centuries.In the modern world,poverty is granted with more complex meanings than starving.People suffering from poverty are often deprived of equal social opportunities.They are more susceptible to poor living conditions,lack of material supply,emotional disturbances,alcohol and substance abuse,and a much lower life expectancy than the rich.Meanwhile,the deprived opportunities include the chance of quality education,the chance to improve their society status,and the chance to enjoy traveling,dining,watching movies,reading,participating in sports activities,and going to concerts.These lost opportunities make it extremely difficult for the poor to get rid of poverty.In this essay,several different schools of thought regarding the origin and implication of poverty will be analyzed,with functionalism thoughts identified as the most valid one.
幾個世紀以來,貧窮一直是人類社會的一種疾病。在現代世界,貧窮的含義比饑餓更為復雜。貧窮的人往往被剝奪平等的社會機會。他們更容易受到貧窮的生活條件、缺乏物質供應、情感障礙、酗酒和濫用物質的影響。與富人相比,他們的預期壽命要低得多。與此同時,被剝奪的機會包括接受優質教育的機會、提高社會地位的機會,以及享受旅行、吃飯、看電影、讀書、參加體育活動和去聽音樂會的機會。這些被剝奪的機會使本文分析了貧困的起源和含義,并以功能主義思想為最有效的思想流派。

The structuralism(conflict)view of poverty believes that the true nature of poverty is deprivation and exploitation of the poor.A natural conflict exists between the powerful and the weak,or between the rich and the poor.The powerful want to maintain their social status at all costs,and poverty has become the most effective weapon for them to do so.Structuralism view argues that capitalism has created an unequal relationship between the capitalists and the workers(Patnaik,2012).The surplus values created by workers have been grabbed by the capitalists,leading to the unbalanced distribution of social wealth.Meanwhile,it is extremely difficult for the poor to become capitalists themselves,with no accumulation of wealth or experience.Meanwhile,the wealthy also have other means of influence over the poor,by providing them only with partial information.This is supported by the increasingly monopolized mass media in the modern world.Lack of information and opportunity thus become the major obstacles for the poor to get rid of poverty.
貧窮的結構主義(沖突)觀點認為,貧窮的真正本質是對窮人的剝奪和剝削。強者與弱者,或富人與窮人之間存在著一種自然的沖突。強者不惜一切代價維持他們的社會地位,而貧窮結構主義觀點認為,資本主義在資本家和工人之間建立了不平等的關系(Patnaik,2012年),工人創造的剩余價值被資本家攫取,導致分配不平衡。社會財富。與此同時,窮人很難自己成為資本家,沒有財富或經驗的積累。同時,富人也有其他方式影響窮人,只向他們提供部分信息。這一點得到了越來越多的人的支持。在現代社會,大眾傳媒是壟斷的,缺乏信息和機會成為窮人擺脫貧困的主要障礙。

In the age of globalization,such class conflict and deprivation happen not only within countries,but increasingly in the international level(Patnaik,2012).Poorer countries have little choice but to sacrifice their environment and natural resources to provide cheap labor for the developed countries.Although the structuralism theories present valid points,they have failed to acknowledge the countless cases of success rising from the lower social classes.The people who have been rich a century ago may not be the richest nowadays.In the case of the post-communist Poland,the rising new elite class in the society shows that rather than a systematic flaw,poverty is more of a result of individual pathology(Ost,2015).This diminishes the claim that poverty is an effective tool of stratification.Poverty should not be viewed as an intrinsic characteristic of capitalism,especially in the age of information and technology,where more opportunities are presented not only to the rich,but all members of the society.
<标题> 在全球化時代,這種階級沖突和剝奪不僅發生在國家內部,而且在國際層面上也日益增多(Patnaik,2012年)。較貧窮的國家別無選擇,只能犧牲環境和自然資源,為發達國家提供廉價勞動力。盡管結構主義理論目前有效。重點是,他們沒有認識到從下層社會階層中崛起的無數成功案例。一個世紀前富有的人可能不是當今最富有的人。在后共產主義的波蘭,社會中崛起的新精英階層表明,貧窮更多地是個人的結果,而不是系統性的缺陷。病理學(OST,2015年)。這削弱了貧困是一種有效的分層工具的說法。貧困不應被視為資本主義的內在特征,尤其是在信息和技術時代,不僅向富人,而且向社會所有成員提供更多的機會。

The functionalism theories consider poverty as both necessary and inevitable for society stability.Poverty is necessary because in order for those who are talented to make contributions to the society,they must be properly rewarded.By properly it means personal interest will always be the most effective motivation of individuals(Mackenbach,2017).Poverty is also inevitable,because it is natural that only a partial of behavioral patterns will be most handsomely rewarded under one social mechanism(Mackenbach,2017).And such patterns are always the ones that are the most contributive to the development of the sustainment of the society.Preference thus leads inevitably to poverty.Poverty is necessary for the current degree of development of the human society,since there has to be someone to do the less honorable and well-paid jobs,and there has to be someone to consume the low quality but cheaper products.The social hierarchy created by poverty is found to be contributive in certain ways:it improves collective decision-making and coordinate individual actions towards a common goal(Mackenbach,2017).However,the functions of poverty do not mean that poverty is desirable.Poverty is merely an inevitable stage of the current development of human society,to be replaced by something superior and more just in future developments.

<标题>There is also the interactionism and culturalism views of poverty.These theories emphasize not on the definition or origin,but the lived experiences of the poor and the rich.The common emotions induced by poverty include the sense of frustration and feelings of social exclusion,as demonstrated by the poor youths from Northern Ireland(Horgan,2011).A sub-culture of poverty has been formed among these young people,that they are trapped in a cycle of non-constructive,even self-harming behaviors.Being the outsiders and disadvantaged groups of the society,the poor often have no alternative to poverty,since it has already become part of their mentality and lifestyle.The interactionism and culturalism views pf poverty are effective in explaining specific cases,but they fail to establish an overarching generic rule regarding poverty.

In conclusion,the functionalism theories are found to be the most successful in explaining poverty,due to the powerful logic they offer.Provided with the current physical conditions,the equal distribution of social wealth seems completely impractical:it diminished the motivation of the talented individuals and reduces the social coordination by breaking the existing hierarchy.In the current stage,poverty still contains important social functions keeping the society relatively stable.Meanwhile,it is not impossible for poverty to become obsolete,once the human society enters the next phase of development.After all,poverty is still acknowledged as the enemy of civilization and equal human rights.

References

<标题>Horgan,G.(2011).The making of an outsider:Growing up in poverty in Northern Ireland.Youth&Society,43(2),453-467.doi:10.1177/0044118X10383543

Mackenbach,J.P.(2017).Persistence of social inequalities in modern welfare states:Explanation of a paradox.Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,45(2),113-120.doi:10.1177/1403494816683878

Ost,D.(2015).Stuck in the past and the future:Class analysis in post-communist Poland.East European Politics&Societies and Cultures,29(3),610-624.doi:10.1177/0888325415602058

Patnaik,U.(2012).Capitalism and the production of poverty.Social Scientist,40(1/2),3-20.

<标题>Portfolio Theme 4.

<标题>Poverty has been a topic of interest for social scientists all over the world.both the developed and developing states have an interest in exploring the nature of poverty.In the process,social scientists have adopted diverging paths to study poverty.When approaching a problem related with poverty,researchers often face the tough choice on the most appropriate way to study.Epistemology is the part of philosophy that deals with knowledge,and methodology is the set of methods and principles applied to obtain knowledge.In this essay,the relationship between epistemological and methodological approaches to poverty will be explored,followed by an analysis on the implications of the two methods,and the mixture of them,on social science results.

<标题>In general,epistemology serves as the guide for methodology.Poverty is the study of both numbers and phenomenon.Therefore,both qualitative and quantitative approaches are necessary to fully understand poverty in social science.This leaves a complicated situation for researchers to pick the optimal alternative among the numerous ones,and epistemology it the basis of such selections(Balarabe Kura,2012).Different epistemologies correspond to different methodologies,and different styles of research.One fundamental difference between the styles can be the aim of research:some researchers are trying to prove the existence of objective rules and laws governing the society.Based on these rules,they can apply the same theories to multiple case studies of poverty and gain validity.For example,the functionalism view of poverty is considered a way of generalization,to find the common rules behind poverty.Others try to explain a phenomenon,instead of finding the more generic rules behind it.For example,the interactionism theories regarding poverty is an attempt to explain,with the most comprehensible(relatively)features of poverty presented.Finally,there are also researchers who tend to criticize existing phenomenon,from the logical and ethical perspectives.The social conflict and class segregation view of poverty is an example of this style.Based on the different aims and styles,different approaches have been taken by researchers,arriving at distinctive results.Comparing epistemology and methodology,it can be observed that methodology has a more direct impact on the knowledge production and theory formulation process in social science.However,the basis of the methods adopted is epistemology.

The two major epistemological perspectives are positivism and interpretivism(Bryman,2012).Positivism emphasizes on the importance of paralleling social science with natural sciences.Naturally,it involves more quantitative research methods.Common methods associated with positivism include experiments,data collection,operationalization,and deduction.Meanwhile,it also involves inductive strategy,by gathering facts to provide the fundamentals of a generic rule or social law.In positivism,only the phenomena and knowledge that are verifiable through the sense are considered valid.This means that positivism is the strict performer of objectivity(Bryman,2012).The personal values and emotions of the researchers are often forbidden in positivism.Such requirements would inevitably increase the size and scale of research,since more empirical evidence or data must be gathered in order to prove a hypothesis.The number of selected research participants is also significantly larger,with an emphasis on breadth over depth.The outcome of social research guided by positivism principles are laws that are generic and logically sound.Meanwhile,these laws and rules must be able to be scrutinized by anyone and still hold true.In comparison,the interpretivism approach is the exact opposite of positivism.It promotes the distinctiveness of human nature,which requires more than explaining social phenomena,but understanding of them.It is common for researchers to adopt an empathetic attitude towards the research subjects,which is not common for positivism.As a result,interpretivism adopts the qualitative research methods much more frequently,including quasi-experiments,descriptions and in-depth studies of single subjects.This allows researchers to narrow down the size and scale of research,reduce the number of participants.The product of interpretivism can be highly subjective,with strong value or ethical elements contained in it.

<标题>Epistemologies and methodologies do not necessarily distinguish from each other absolutely,leading to the formation of a series approaches of mixed methods research(Bryman,2012).There are multiple ways of integrating quantitative and qualitative research for poverty studies.The triangulation of two approaches is also known as the integration among the two,to provide more reliable results.By applying two approaches at the same time,the validity of a theory can be tested two times,making it more credible than either approach alone.For instance,the theory of the social class conflict as the origin of poverty can be further enhanced with historical evidence from different countries.Failing to provide the deliberate attempt of the richer social class to deprive and exploit the poor,the credibility of the theory is significantly diminished.In addition to the ability to validity and increase the credibility of the results,the mixed methods research will also contribute to a more complete answer to the research question(Bryman,2012).It is common for gaps to be left when only one type of approach is used in research.Mix methods research aims to achieve a balance between objectivity and subjectivity,between values,attitudes,and facts,so that the final theory created can be accepted by more audience.

The attempt for researchers to hold different approaches as fundamentally different is quite meaningless.Both quantitative and qualitative approaches have some distinctive positive qualities,and the combination of the two only makes the study on poverty more complete.For example,in the research about“Capitalism and the Production of Poverty”,the author applies both approaches in deriving how poverty is formed in the capitalism context(Patnaik,2012).Since this study involves the international scale of research,data collection becomes inevitable for the result to be valid.The author uses the output and consumption of cereals for different purposes in different regions of the world,to demonstrate the degree of poverty in these regions.Numbers are indeed an honest and direct way to present the facts to the readers.In addition,the social conflict theories of Marx have also been used by the author to aid the argument.Both qualitative and quantitative approaches are necessary for the author to derive the conclusion,that poverty is a struggle between the deprived people and the ruling class.In a way,statistics and deduction theories complement,instead of contradicting each other.When people are trying to measure poverty,data collection is inevitable.However,the data collected cannot lead to effective results without qualitative analysis(Schwartzman,1998).The latter provides data collection with directions,on what are the right questions to asks,and which data are truly valuable to the results.

<标题>In conclusion,mixed methods research is considered the optimal way to conduct sociology studies on poverty.Poverty is a complex social issue that involves not only data and facts,but also the interpretation of human intent behind physical phenomena.Methodologies serve as the more direct influence on poverty research,but it cannot be independent from the guiding epistemologies.The adoption of epistemological perspectives(either positivism or interpretivism)is not neutral,but determined by how social scientists envision the connections between different social factors.The determination on whether to integrate quantitative and qualitative approaches in one research should be determined by the epistemological perspectives of the scientists,the nature of the topic,the objectives of the researchers,and multiple other factors(Balarabe Kura,2012).Overall,mixed methods research is found to be the optimal choice for social scientists in studying poverty.

References

Balarabe Kura,S.Y.(2012).Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to the Study of Poverty:Taming the Tensions and Appreciating the Complementarities.The Qualitative Report,17(20),1-19.Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss20/4

<标题>Bryman,A.(2012).Mixed methods research:Combining quantitative and qualitative research.Social Research Methods.Oxford University Press;4th edition.

Bryman,A.(2012).Social research strategies.Social Research Methods.Oxford University Press;4th edition.

<标题>Patnaik,U.(2012).Capitalism and the production of poverty.Social Scientist,40(1/2),3-20.

Schwartzman,S.(1998).The Statistical Measurement of Poverty.Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics.

猜您喜歡
評論已關閉。
? ?